Author Archive

Have you been to the front lines?

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

We all know that marketing is only successful if it taps into the hopes, dreams, problems, challenges of your end user. But one challenge I’ve observed marketers struggle with over the years, regardless of industry, is truly understanding that end user. It’s not always for lack of trying; here are a few well-intentioned pitfalls I’ve seen:

evolution (lack thereof):
Marketers can sometimes hold onto a static understanding of their target audience. Over time, technology improves, economic demands change, competition morphs, the audience ages and their lives are just different. That original audience profile can get dusty real fast.

nepotism: “Let me see what my wife/husband/daughter/cousin/niece thinks.” Ouch. Granted, it’s admirable to admit you’re not really the target audience, but asking one or two family members does not market research make.

boardroom: Otherwise known as “the ivory tower syndrome.” A group of intelligent, well-educated, seasoned executives gather in a sterile conference room with their thick presentations chock full of words and charts and graphs. Certainly, this can often lead to well-developed strategies. But it can also result in a removal from reality, understanding by committee, and a watered-down approach.

What are the antidotes? Of course, marketing research can be quite valuable, if done correctly. Both quantitative and qualitative surveys can give marketers keen insight and a good picture of their audience. But if budget does not allow, one often overlooked method of getting close to your audience is your front-line employees.

Retail clerks, customer service reps, salespeople all hear, on a daily basis, the complaints, challenges and compliments, straight from the horse’s mouth. So the next time you’re embarking on marketing planning, get out of the conference room and get a bit closer to the street. You may be surprised at what you learn.

Breaking old (marketing) habits

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Recently, I was honored to be asked to speak at a conference of the National Speakers Association’s New England chapter. Their conference had three tracks: for corporate, professional, and emerging speakers. My presentation – “Does your marketing back you up? Positioning for competitive advantage” – was to the professional group. (A great audience, by the way! Very engaged and welcoming.) As I spoke to them about the importance of positioning and how vital it is to marketing, it occurred to me that in a sense, the emerging speakers have a leg up: they have a blank slate onto which to create their own unique position in their market. But the group I spoke to had history. Their slate was not blank.
Screen shot 2010-07-01 at 12.09.28 PM
Most companies are in the same boat: they have years of marketing under their belt. Of course, not being brand new has its advantages – having experience and a reputation gives existing businesses something to build on. But, at the same time, marketing can become habitual. “Oh, we always advertise in that publication.” Or, “This is how we describe our services.” Or, “We tried that five years ago; didn’t work.” Do any of these sound familiar?

I encouraged the group to take a fresh look at what they’ve been doing to position and market themselves, and I encourage other marketers to do the same. When it comes time to truly reassess your marketing efforts, sometimes it’s best to not look at what you have been doing, but rather look at what you should be doing.  Try this out: imagine you are creating a brand new company – competing in the same space you’re in now. What kind of company would you create? How would you position yourselves in the competitive landscape? What would be the primary benefit of your products or services for your customers? Keep an open mind, and you might be surprised at the inspiration you find in a blank page!

Just be yourself

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Remember that great advice your mom would offer when you were nervous about your first day of school? Or perhaps a well-meaning friend before your very first real job interview or a blind date? “Just be yourself!” It probably didn’t seem all that helpful at the time, but they were right. It is always better to be yourself (well, the best version of yourself). Trying to be something you’re not is usually pretty tiring, and people end up seeing right through you. Authenticity is attractive.

As I prepare to give a presentation on positioning later this week at Speaker U, I keep coming back to that advice. I think successful positioning is kind of the same thing: it’s a company presenting its authentic self (okay, the best, most distilled version of itself). Finding yourself isn’t always easy for a business, but it’s so important – and why positioning is such a valuable process. Take a look at how your company markets itself: does it truly communicate the authentic core of who you are? Are you being yourself?

To me, JetBlue is a great example of a company knowing their personality and following through on it. All you have to do is read their tagline to know what they’re about – and it comes through in the language on their site, the ease of booking, even the snacks they serve.

What do you think? Any other brands or companies that exhibit authentic personality come to mind?

Breaking news: teens text a lot

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Okay, so it’s not exactly breaking news. But a recent report puts some big numbers behind this phenomenon. The average number of texts per day is now at 80 for girls, 30 for boys. And it’s increasing, especially now that 75% of American teens have cell phones. And get this: texting is their #1 form of communication with friends, more than face-to-face or phone. This means constant interaction, constant availability, constant multi-tasking. As those of you with teenage children know (or those of you who are actually teens), the cell phone is virtually an appendage. Four out of 5 teens with phones take them to bed.

The various and scary affects this phenomenon could have culturally and on our interactions as humans aside, I think there are some key takeaways for marketers targeting a younger audience:

Get to the point. Keep your messages succinct. Attention spans are decreasing all the time.

Don’t expect their full attention. Ever. Multi-tasking is the norm, for better or (more likely) for worse.

Be available. Expectations for availability will continue to rise as these texting teens become adults. There should always be multiple ways for consumers to communicate with businesses, preferably 24/7.

Words matter. Subtleties in language and punctuation are actually getting more attention, particularly among girls.

Computers still rule for the web. Among students with smart phones, only 27% use them to go online. Computers are still the primary method for accessing websites.

And, don’t challenge a teen to a thumb war; you’ll probably lose.

In looking at the big picture, what do you think – has technology fundamentally changed marketing communications, or do we just have newer, shinier tools?

Quantifying the digital world

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Hello, my name is Jean, and I love statistics.

ComScore just issued their “2009 U.S. Digital Year in Review” report. I pulled out some tidbits and insights I found interesting. (Note any comparative numbers are for 2009 vs. 2008.)

Web searching ain’t going anywhere.
More people are searching more: the number of unique searchers is up 6% and searches per searcher up 10% (yeah, you may need to read that more than once).
Google remains at the top: Bing showed some gains but Google still owns about 66% of search market share.

Neither is social networking, and everybody’s doing it.
It now accounts for 11% of total time spent online.
Facebook and Twitter had growth spurts (visits up 105% and 900%!, respectively).
Facebook is getting more habitual with members going more often (about 27x per month, up 64%) but for a little bit less time (9 min. per average visit, down from 10).
Facebook reaches all ages: the 25-34 age group grew the most at 22%, at the expense of the 24 & younger crowd, but 35-49 is still the largest group.
Former leader MySpace is still kicking at #2, but getting younger and more music-focused.

Display advertising growth is keeping pace.
Ad impressions are up 21%.
Yahoo sites serve up the most ads.
AT&T and Verizon are the #1 and #2 online advertisers (maybe because opportunities exist in the fact that smart phones are still only 17% of the market).

We like things that move.
More people are watching video: In December, 86% of the online audience viewed videos.
And more of them: average watcher viewed 187 videos in December, up 96%.
For longer: the average video length grew from 3.2 to 4.1 minutes.
But from more sources: half of these videos were on sites that rank outside of the top 25, which means opportunity for smaller sites.

So what does all this mean for marketers? This is not new news, but the web is becoming more and more a part of our daily lives. It’s what we do every day. It’s where we get our news, our advice, our entertainment, our friends, our new shoes. Opportunities for marketers lie in connecting with your audience, reaching them where they live, and integrating with offline activity (much like consumers do). It’s a moving target and to keep up, it’s important to devote time and resources (appropriate to your business and industry) to staying with or ahead of the crowd.

If you’re like me and want more info, you can download the whitepaper here.

p.s.  I’ll leave you with another one of my favorite things – quizzes. What single day in 2009 do you think had the highest e-commerce sales? (Free smith&jones t-shirt to anyone who puts the right answer in the comments section by this Friday, 2/19. Honor system, now – no cheating!)

Nowhere to hide – the new customer service

Friday, January 8th, 2010

I did quite a bit of my shopping online this holiday season, as did several other S&Jers, and probably as you did too. For the most part, I had very good experiences (thank you, thinkgeek.com & zappos.com). Some of my co-workers weren’t so fortunate. Items were back-ordered without notification, incomplete shipments… the usual suspects. We had a bit of a gripe session here about it, which got me thinking about how customer service has evolved along with technology. Today, we shoppers have higher expectations and louder voices. We look for satisfaction 24/7 — not just during business hours as it was back in the day. And give us multiple ways to reach you please: email, live chat, phone, snail mail, smoke signals…  Yep, it’s a new reality, and some companies are rising to the occasion, some not so much.

Two cases in point: one S&Jer ordered something online from Company #1, never got a notification, didn’t get any response from email, couldn’t get through on the phone. So she did what any self-respecting Gen Yer does: she tweeted about it and named names. Didn’t get her any further in her quest, but it probably made her feel better — and it spread the word to her network. This same S&Jer also had a backordering issue with Company #2. So she called, immediately got an actual human being on the phone, and explained her situation. The pleasant lady cancelled her backordered item, and to be nice, gave her 25% off an already received item. Someone in that company had empowered the reps to do what they felt right to assuage a disappointed customer. Yes, it cost them the 25%, but an irate customer would have lost them more in the long run. Oh, and this S&Jer also tweeted about her good experience too. My guess is, it won’t be long before Company #1 goes out of business or totally reassesses their way of doing business. The Darwinism of retailing, if you will.

The way I see it, companies can look at this new technology-empowered consumer as a burden or an opportunity. The smart ones are realizing they can open a dialogue and develop relationships with their customers, get feedback on their products quickly and, as in the case of Company #2, get a second chance to correct mistakes. Here’s hoping that this new era of transparency and sharing and tweeting and Facebooking will raise everyone’s game. Power to the people!

So bad they’re good?

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Those of us in advertising (to be fair: some, not all) have traditionally thumbed our noses at infomercial-style commercials as being not strategically based, poorly produced and well, a bit cheesey. But is it possible they’re so bad they’re good? We’re all familiar with the Snuggie commercial. You know, the one where the poor woman can’t figure out how to use a blanket. We all laugh at it, but I’ll bet you mostly everyone you know has heard of the Snuggie. And, how many of us can boast ignorance of the Sham-Wow guy? A precious few, I’ll wager. Despite the egregious typo in the website page title that would make any copywriter’s head spin, they’re likely still selling. And although not exactly in the same genre as Snuggie and Sham-Wow, I just heard this radio spot for mercury safety, and sadly, I can not get the “Don’t put mercury in the trash” chorus out of my head. Which I suppose is the objective.

It makes us marketing types scratch our heads and wonder… have we been wasting our time strategizing and concepting? Is our life’s work unappreciated and unnecessary? No, I cry! For every amused viewer of these spots, there are probably five who scramble for the remote to change the channel. And for every Snuggie-type success, chances are there are countless failures we just don’t hear about. But what do you think? Are they so bad they’re good? Or just plain bad?